I'd be interested in seeing the data that proves this claim.
I'm guessing that there is NO evidence for this judgement (because it certainly isn't a statement of fact).
I'm always amused when someone says something such as this.
The anecdotal evidence to the contrary however, is vast.
Think about this (yes, i'm afraid you do occasionally have to actually think for yourselves), when was the period in our recent history when cannabis usage was most widespread...the 60's and 70's. OK, now do the research on baby boomers, and on birthrates, and miscarriage rates for those two decades. Now factor in advances in antenatal and postnatal medical care since those two decades.
You will see that there is no drop in the average numbers, in fact the reverse is so.
So the obvious question is this:
If the original poster's 'judgement' is correct, how does one expain that birth rates / miscarriage rates / anomoly rates etc have no marked increase, whilst cannabis use had rocketted?
It's fairly easy to explain actually...at least it is to people who actually think for themselves, and don't rely on a daily diet of alarmist propoganda.
Did you find this post useful?

17

12